Hansal Mehta talks to us exclusively after his fight with Anupam Kher on twitter, about The Accidental Prime Minister. Hopes to make “lesser errors of judgement

Filmmaker Hansal Mehta stands by his stance of supporting Vir Sanghvi’s critical tweet on the film The Accidental Prime Minister. While actor Anupam Kher, who played the lead role of late Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the 2019 film, didn’t approve of Mehta’s support to the tweet against the film, the filmmaker, who was also the creative producer for the film, has no regrets.

The late ex-PM died on December 26, leading to the discussion around the film made on his tenure as a Prime Minister.

On Friday, Vir Sanghvi had tweeted, “If you want to remember the lies that were told about Manmohan Singh you should rewatch The Accidental Prime Minister. It is not only one of the worst Hindi movies ever made but is an example of how media was used to tarnish the name of a good man.” Reacting to it, Hansal wrote, “+100.”

Anupam Kher, 69, then wrote a long tweet saying that while he has no problem with Sanghvi expressing his opinion, Mehta, who was the creative director of the film shouldn’t go against the film.

Speaking to HtCity exclusively on Kher’s reaction, Hansal Mehta says, “I stand by my successes as I do my failures. I own up to my mistakes as much as I do any other choices I’ve made in my life. But to self-reflect, to introspect and to admit in hindsight that I’ve erred is my prerogative. There are times in a career where you carry out professional duties even when in dissonance or not in control with the work assigned to you. By self-reflection I hope to make lesser errors of judgement in the future.”

However, Hansal doesn’t back down for the respect he has for Kher.

“I think what irked Mr Kher was my agreement with another senior journalists criticism of the film. That might have been ill timed and deemed unnecessary but it reiterated some of my sentiments. Mr Kher is a senior and I will not resort to any mud-slinging towards him, his name calling or his opinions. I might have differences with him but the process of working with him was made pleasant because of his affable nature and commitment. Having said that I have often been self-critical and that is who I am. It helps me evolve and move forward. Nothing or nobody can stop that,” concludes Mehta.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Minister Calls for CBFC to Answer for Oppenheimer-Bhagavad Gita Controversy

The recent controversy surrounding the depiction of J. Robert Oppenheimer and the Bhagavad Gita in a film has sparked heated debates and discussions across India. As the issue gains momentum, a government minister has called upon the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to provide clarity and justification for its decision regarding the contentious scenes in the movie. In this blog, we delve into the details of the controversy, explore the implications of the minister’s call for accountability, and discuss the importance of preserving artistic freedom while respecting cultural sensitivities.

The controversy centers around a film that features a scene depicting J. Robert Oppenheimer, a prominent physicist and key figure in the development of the atomic bomb. In this scene, Oppenheimer allegedly recites verses from the Bhagavad Gita, a revered ancient Hindu scripture. The inclusion of Oppenheimer reciting the verses, along with the historical context of the atomic bomb’s creation, has sparked outrage among certain sections of society.

Opponents of the scene argue that it is inappropriate to associate a sacred text like the Bhagavad Gita with a figure linked to such a devastating event in history. They claim that it not only misrepresents the scripture’s teachings but also hurts the sentiments of the Hindu community.

Amidst the intensifying controversy, a government minister has raised concerns about the CBFC’s role in certifying the film without addressing potential sensitivities. The minister’s call for accountability stems from the belief that the CBFC should exercise its responsibility to safeguard against any misrepresentation or distortion of cultural or religious elements in films. Critics argue that the board may have overlooked the potential impact of the scene on religious sentiments, leading to the need for an explanation from the CBFC.

The debate surrounding artistic freedom versus cultural sensitivities is a complex and delicate one. Filmmakers, artists, and creative professionals advocate for the freedom to express their artistic vision without undue censorship or restrictions. Art has long been a medium for exploring diverse perspectives and challenging societal norms. However, this creative liberty comes with the responsibility to consider the potential implications of their work, particularly concerning culturally sensitive subjects.

On the other hand, the protection of cultural and religious sentiments is equally important, as they are integral to the social fabric of a diverse nation like India. Insensitive portrayal or misrepresentation of cultural elements can inadvertently lead to disharmony and hurt sentiments.

The Oppenheimer-Bhagavad Gita controversy serves as a reminder of the delicate balance that must be struck between artistic freedom and cultural sensitivities. The government minister’s call for the CBFC to address the concerns is an important step towards ensuring accountability and transparency in the certification process. As the CBFC responds to the controversy, it must engage in a constructive dialogue with filmmakers and stakeholders to better understand and navigate the complex terrain of cultural representation.

In the spirit of a democratic and inclusive society, both filmmakers and certification bodies should strive to foster an environment where artistic freedom thrives while respecting the sentiments and beliefs of diverse communities. Ultimately, open communication and mutual understanding will pave the way for a culturally enriched cinematic landscape that celebrates creativity and honors the nation’s cultural heritage.

General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

Speculations Surrounding Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s Absence: A Closer Look

In recent days, rumors and speculations have been circulating in various media outlets and diplomatic circles about the absence of Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang from official engagements. While the Chinese government has not provided any official statement regarding the matter, some sources have suggested that his absence could be linked to an alleged extramarital affair. In this blog post, we will delve into the situation, examining the available information, considering the implications, and reflecting on the importance of responsible reporting in such sensitive matters.

It is essential to note that as of the writing of this blog post, the rumors regarding Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s personal life remain unverified and unsubstantiated. Due to the lack of official information, it is crucial to treat these speculations with skepticism and refrain from forming hasty conclusions. In today’s age of instant information dissemination, it is not uncommon for baseless rumors to gain traction rapidly.

When dealing with public figures, especially high-ranking officials, it is imperative for the media and the public to exercise discretion and adhere to ethical journalism. Spreading unverified rumors can not only damage the individual’s reputation but can also have far-reaching consequences on the diplomatic relations between nations.

Foreign Minister Qin Gang plays a crucial role in representing China’s interests and engaging with other countries. If indeed he is facing personal challenges, the matter should be treated with utmost respect for privacy and sensitivity. In the absence of concrete evidence, it is unfair and unethical to make assumptions about his personal life, let alone speculate about its impact on his professional duties.

While the media may find rumors about high-profile figures intriguing, it is essential to remember that Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s potential absence concerns diplomatic matters. As such, discussions and debates should center around the implications of his absence on international relations and China’s foreign policies rather than on his personal life.

As rumors continue to swirl around Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s absence, it is crucial to exercise restraint and refrain from engaging in irresponsible speculations. Instead, the focus should be on maintaining a constructive dialogue surrounding China’s foreign policy and diplomatic efforts. By adhering to ethical journalism and responsible reporting, we can promote a culture of understanding and respect in international relations, fostering a world where personal matters do not overshadow crucial diplomatic discussions.

It is essential to remember that public figures are also human beings who deserve privacy and dignity. Let us, as global citizens, demonstrate empathy and restraint, respecting the personal space of others while remaining focused on fostering constructive diplomatic relationships among nations.

General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/