The Indian Supreme Court (SC) is hearing petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which was enacted into law last month. Chief Justice BR Gavai stated that laws passed by Parliament are assumed to be constitutional, and courts cannot intervene unless there is a clear and serious problem. The apex court identified three key issues: Waqf by user.

The nomination of non-Muslims to the Waqf Council and state Waqf Boards, and the identification of government land as Waqf property. The Centre had assured it would not proceed on these matters until the case was settled. However, senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, opposed this. Sibal argued that the Act.

Is designed to seize Waqf lands without due process, and that only a person who has practised Islam for at least five years can create a Waqf. Chief Justice Gavai responded that there is a presumption of Constitutionality in legislation passed by Parliament and that courts cannot interfere unless a glaring case is made out New Delhi, May 20: Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y.

Chandrachud, along with Justice B.R. Gavial, made a significant observation during a Supreme Court hearing regarding the constitutional validity of the Waqf Act, 1995. In a statement that could have far-reaching implications, Justice Gavial remarked that “courts cannot interfere unless a glaring case is made out. The remark came during the hearing of a petition that.

Challenged certain provisions of the Waqf Act, citing alleged violation of constitutional principles such as equality before law, secularism, and property rights. The petitioner argued that the Act conferred excessive powers on the Waqf Boards and allowed encroachment on private property under the pretext of religious administration Justice Gavai, while responding.

To the petitioner’s counsel, emphasized the constitutional limits within which the judiciary operates. “Every religious or charitable trust—be it Hindu, Christian, or Muslim—has its own framework under the law. Unless a glaring violation of constitutional rights is demonstrated, judicial interference would be unwarranted,” he stated The bench questioned whether.

The petitioner had established sufficient grounds to show that the Act was inherently discriminatory or arbitrary. “We are not here to sit in judgment over Parliament’s legislative competence unless it is shown that the law is manifestly unconstitutional,” CJI Chandrachud added The Waqf Act, 1995, governs the administration of waqf properties—assets donated for.

Religious or charitable purposes under Islamic law. The Act provides for the creation of State Waqf Boards to manage such properties and address related disputes. Over the years, it has been the subject of several legal controversies, particularly concerning land ownership and the scope of powers exercised by the Waqf Boards The petitioner contended that the Act enables.

Waqf Boards to unilaterally declare properties as waqf without due legal process, thereby infringing on the property rights of individuals. The counsel also cited instances where people discovered that their land was classified as waqf only during transactions or legal disputes Justice Gavai acknowledged that concerns regarding land ownership and procedural fairness.

Important but reiterated the need for clear constitutional breaches before striking down any law. “You may have individual grievances, but that does not automatically render the entire Act unconstitutional,” he said The court advised the petitioner to pursue remedies through civil courts in cases of disputed property classification. CJI Chandrachud remarked someone.

Land has been wrongly notified as waqf, they have the right to challenge it. But that is a matter of individual litigation, not a ground to annul the statute itself Legal.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

Bollywood actor Paresh Rawal has confirmed his exit from Priyadarshan’s Hera Pheri 3 film, despite rumors of creative differences. In an interview with Mid-Day, Rawal revealed that he chose not to return to the franchise due to feeling unappealing in the role. He denied any creative differences with the director and revealed that remuneration was not one of reasons.

Fhis decision to quit the film Paresh said that he loved Priyadarshan and had great respect and faith in him as a director. He also mentioned that Akshay and Suniel were informed of his decision and that the filmmaker “tried to change his mind” but didn’t pursue it further after he decided to walk out of the film The Hera Pheri franchise is one of the most iconic comedy film.

Series in Indian cinema, featuring the iconic trio Akshay Kumar, Suniel Shetty, and Paresh Rawal. The film became a cult classic, known for its slapstick humor, memorable dialogues, and the unforgettable character of Baburao Ganpatrao Apte, played by Rawal After Rawal’s exit, some internet users believed the film wouldn’t be made, as it wouldn’t be the same.

Without the actor’s character, Baburao Ganpatrao Apte In other news, there have been rumors about Akshay Kumar sueing Rawal for ₹25 crores as damages for sabotaging Hera Pheri 3 Mumbai, May 20: Veteran actor Paresh Rawal has opened up about his initial hesitation to return for Hera Pheri 3, revealing that director Priyadarshan made a personal effort to.

Convince him to reconsider his decision. The actor, who plays the iconic character Baburao Ganpatrao Apte, said he had serious reservations about being part of the third installment of the beloved comedy franchise In a recent interview, Rawal admitted that he had considered walking away from Hera Pheri 3 due to concerns about the script and the direction.

There was a time when I genuinely felt it might be better to step back. I didn’t want to do something just for the sake of nostalgia or commercial success. I just felt it is a role that deserves dignity and proper treatment,” Rawal stated The Hera Pheri series, which started in 2000, has become a cult classic, largely due to the chemistry between its lead trio—Akshay.

Kumar as Raju, Suniel Shetty as Shyam, and Paresh Rawal as the unforgettable Baburao. Over the years, fans have repeatedly demanded a third film, but the project has faced multiple delays and changes in creative leadership According to Rawal, it was director Priyadarshan—who directed the first film—that reached out personally to address his doubts and rekindle his.

Interest in reprising the role. “Priyan sir called me and said, ‘This character is yours. No one else can do it justice.’ That meant a lot. His conviction and vision helped me see that this could still be something special,” Rawal said He also acknowledged that while the industry has changed and comedy trends have evolved, certain characters remain timeless. “Baburao.

Funny character; he has heart, depth, and innocence. People connect with him. So I realized that if done well, the magic can return,” he added The third installment, which is now back on track with the original trio, is being helmed by Farhad Samji, though Priyadarshan has reportedly offered creative input in an advisory capacity. The film promises to retain flavor.

The original while introducing a fresh storyline that builds on the characters’ journey Rawal emphasized the importance of creative integrity in reviving iconic franchises. “Audiences today are very sharp. They can tell when some.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

During the LSG-SRH match in Lucknow, Digvesh Rathi and Abhishek Sharma were involved in a heated clash, leading to the dismissal of Sharma. Rathi pulled off his usual notebook celebration after dismissing Sharma, who smashed 59 off 20 balls. The Sunrisers opener, Abhishek Sharma, exploded at the sight, hurling a mouthful at Rathi, sparking a heated.

Altercation before umpires and teammates intervened During the post-match handshake between the two teams, Abhishek was stopped by LSG assistant coach Vijay Dahiya, who had a small chat with the India T20I batter. Abhishek and Rathi shook hands but kept going at each other verbally. Dahiya walked in from behind and slapped Abhishek, albeit casually.

BCCI vice-president Rajeev Shukla became a mediator after the match and discussed the matter with both Abhishek and Rathi. He stated that chasing a total of 200-plus something would enable the team to win the powerplay In other cricket news, Virat Kohli shared his plan to express himself and knock it around, stating that if he did well, the team would also do well.

The latest news from India, including cricket live scores, schedules, IPL 2025 matches, IPL points table, player stats, and IPL teams, is available in various cities. The IPL points table shows the IPL Orange Cap and Purple Cap, while the IPL points table shows the IPL Orange Cap and Purple Cap. The IPL points table also shows the IPL Orange Cap and Purple Cap.

The IPL 2025 match today is scheduled, and the IPL points table shows the IPL points. The IPL 2025 season is also in full swing, with KL Rahul set to enter the 2026 T20 World Cup fray

New Delhi, May 20: A heated altercation between Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) batter Abhishek Sharma and Delhi Capitals’ support staff member Digvesh Rathi reportedly escalated into a physical confrontation after a recent IPL match, sources within the franchise confirmed. The incident has prompted intervention from BCCI Vice President Rajeev Shukla, who has taken.

Charge of investigating the matter According to eyewitness accounts, the argument began on the field with an exchange of words and continued into the players’ area after the match concluded. The situation reportedly turned ugly when Rathi allegedly slapped Abhishek Sharma during a verbal spat near the dressing room corridor While the precise cause of the.

Altercation remains unclear, initial reports suggest it may have been triggered by an on-field sledging incident that reignited post-match tension. Team officials and security personnel quickly stepped in to defuse the situation, preventing it from spiraling further The BCCI, taking the matter seriously, has launched an internal probe. Rajeev Shukla, known for.

Handling sensitive issues within the cricketing fraternity, has been assigned to oversee the investigation and ensure proper disciplinary action if required Speaking to media on Monday morning, Shukla said, “We will not tolerate any form of violence or misconduct, on or off the field. A detailed inquiry is underway. All involved parties will be given a chance explain their.

Side before any action is taken Both franchises have been directed to submit detailed reports on the incident. Meanwhile, the SRH management has expressed of their player and is cooperating fully with the BCCI Further updates are awaited as statements from the individuals involved are being A post-match clash between SRH’s.

Abhishek Sharma and Delhi Capitals’ staffer Digvesh Rathi turned allegedly slapping the batter. The incident, sparked by an on-field exchange, prompted BCCI Vice President Rajeev Shukla to launch an inquiry. Both franchises have been asked to submit detailed reports

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/