Hansal Mehta talks to us exclusively after his fight with Anupam Kher on twitter, about The Accidental Prime Minister. Hopes to make “lesser errors of judgement

Filmmaker Hansal Mehta stands by his stance of supporting Vir Sanghvi’s critical tweet on the film The Accidental Prime Minister. While actor Anupam Kher, who played the lead role of late Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the 2019 film, didn’t approve of Mehta’s support to the tweet against the film, the filmmaker, who was also the creative producer for the film, has no regrets.

The late ex-PM died on December 26, leading to the discussion around the film made on his tenure as a Prime Minister.

On Friday, Vir Sanghvi had tweeted, “If you want to remember the lies that were told about Manmohan Singh you should rewatch The Accidental Prime Minister. It is not only one of the worst Hindi movies ever made but is an example of how media was used to tarnish the name of a good man.” Reacting to it, Hansal wrote, “+100.”

Anupam Kher, 69, then wrote a long tweet saying that while he has no problem with Sanghvi expressing his opinion, Mehta, who was the creative director of the film shouldn’t go against the film.

Speaking to HtCity exclusively on Kher’s reaction, Hansal Mehta says, “I stand by my successes as I do my failures. I own up to my mistakes as much as I do any other choices I’ve made in my life. But to self-reflect, to introspect and to admit in hindsight that I’ve erred is my prerogative. There are times in a career where you carry out professional duties even when in dissonance or not in control with the work assigned to you. By self-reflection I hope to make lesser errors of judgement in the future.”

However, Hansal doesn’t back down for the respect he has for Kher.

“I think what irked Mr Kher was my agreement with another senior journalists criticism of the film. That might have been ill timed and deemed unnecessary but it reiterated some of my sentiments. Mr Kher is a senior and I will not resort to any mud-slinging towards him, his name calling or his opinions. I might have differences with him but the process of working with him was made pleasant because of his affable nature and commitment. Having said that I have often been self-critical and that is who I am. It helps me evolve and move forward. Nothing or nobody can stop that,” concludes Mehta.

Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/

Speculations Surrounding Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s Absence: A Closer Look

In recent days, rumors and speculations have been circulating in various media outlets and diplomatic circles about the absence of Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang from official engagements. While the Chinese government has not provided any official statement regarding the matter, some sources have suggested that his absence could be linked to an alleged extramarital affair. In this blog post, we will delve into the situation, examining the available information, considering the implications, and reflecting on the importance of responsible reporting in such sensitive matters.

It is essential to note that as of the writing of this blog post, the rumors regarding Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s personal life remain unverified and unsubstantiated. Due to the lack of official information, it is crucial to treat these speculations with skepticism and refrain from forming hasty conclusions. In today’s age of instant information dissemination, it is not uncommon for baseless rumors to gain traction rapidly.

When dealing with public figures, especially high-ranking officials, it is imperative for the media and the public to exercise discretion and adhere to ethical journalism. Spreading unverified rumors can not only damage the individual’s reputation but can also have far-reaching consequences on the diplomatic relations between nations.

Foreign Minister Qin Gang plays a crucial role in representing China’s interests and engaging with other countries. If indeed he is facing personal challenges, the matter should be treated with utmost respect for privacy and sensitivity. In the absence of concrete evidence, it is unfair and unethical to make assumptions about his personal life, let alone speculate about its impact on his professional duties.

While the media may find rumors about high-profile figures intriguing, it is essential to remember that Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s potential absence concerns diplomatic matters. As such, discussions and debates should center around the implications of his absence on international relations and China’s foreign policies rather than on his personal life.

As rumors continue to swirl around Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang’s absence, it is crucial to exercise restraint and refrain from engaging in irresponsible speculations. Instead, the focus should be on maintaining a constructive dialogue surrounding China’s foreign policy and diplomatic efforts. By adhering to ethical journalism and responsible reporting, we can promote a culture of understanding and respect in international relations, fostering a world where personal matters do not overshadow crucial diplomatic discussions.

It is essential to remember that public figures are also human beings who deserve privacy and dignity. Let us, as global citizens, demonstrate empathy and restraint, respecting the personal space of others while remaining focused on fostering constructive diplomatic relationships among nations.

General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

BBC and Three Others Receive New Summonses

Controversies surrounding documentaries have the power to ignite intense debates and shape public opinion. In the latest development, the BBC and three other entities find themselves in the midst of a legal storm as they receive new summonses related to a documentary on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This turn of events raises questions about freedom of expression, media ethics, and the intersection of politics and filmmaking. Let’s delve into the details of this controversy and its potential implications.

The documentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which has stirred controversy, has garnered significant attention for its portrayal of the Indian political landscape. Documentaries offer insights into significant events and personalities, but their subjectivity and interpretation can often be a cause for contention. In this case, the film has sparked legal action against the BBC and three other entities, shedding light on the complexities surrounding its production and distribution.

The summonses received by the BBC and others raise questions about freedom of expression and media ethics. While freedom of expression is a fundamental right, it is also important to consider responsible and ethical journalism. Documentaries have the potential to shape public opinion, and it becomes crucial to ensure accuracy, fairness, and transparency in their portrayal of individuals and events. The summonses indicate a potential breach of these ethical considerations.

The legal action taken against the BBC and the three other entities adds a layer of complexity to the controversy surrounding the documentary. The summonses suggest that there are legal grounds to investigate potential violations, which may lead to a further examination of the film’s content, production process, and distribution. The outcome of these legal proceedings will not only impact the entities involved but also shape public perception of the documentary and its credibility.

The intersection of politics and filmmaking is a fertile ground for debates and controversies. Documentaries centered around political figures often become battlegrounds for competing narratives and perspectives. Filmmakers face the challenge of striking a balance between creative expression and presenting an objective representation of events and individuals. The summonses in this case highlight the sensitivities and complexities involved in documenting political figures.

Controversies surrounding documentaries provide an opportunity for public discourse and critical engagement. These discussions are essential for fostering a deeper understanding of the complexities of political narratives and media representations. It is through informed conversations that societies can navigate these controversies and shape the course of responsible and ethical media practices.

The summonses received by the BBC and three other entities in relation to the documentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlight the ongoing controversy surrounding the film. This development raises questions about freedom of expression, media ethics, and the intersection of politics and filmmaking. As the legal proceedings unfold, it becomes imperative to engage in informed discussions and critical analysis, ensuring responsible and ethical media practices. Ultimately, it is through these discussions that societies can navigate complex political narratives and shape a more informed and inclusive public discourse.

Group Media Publications
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in