Delhi NCR
Mohanlal praises Prithviraj Sukumar’s “creativity” as he concludes filming for L2 Empuraan.

Mohanlal wraps up shooting for L2 Empuraan; lauds Prithviraj Sukumar’s ‘creativity’
Mohanlal has reprised his role for the sequel of Prithviraj Sukumaran’s hit 2019 film Lucifer. The film will be released theatrically in 2025.
Prithviraj Sukumaran and Mohanlal wrapped up shooting for their next film together, L2: Empuraan. This is the third time Prithviraj has directed the actor, after the 2019 film Lucifer and the 2022 film Bro Daddy. (Also Read: Barroz virtual 3D trailer: Mohanlal’s ambitious first directorial sees him play a ghost in Disney-like fantasy. Watch)
Mohanlal on L2: Empuraan
After wrapping up shooting for the sequel of Lucifer, Prithviraj wrote on X (formerly Twitter), “At 5:35 am today, by the banks of the Malampuzha reservoir, we canned the final shot of #L2E #EMPURAAN See you in theatres in 117 days!” Mohanlal also penned a long note on X, thanking the film’s team.
A portion of his note reads, “What an incredible 14-month journey across 8 states and 4 countries, including the UK, USA, and UAE. This film owes its magic to the brilliant direction of Prithviraj Sukumaran whose creativity elevates every frame.” He also added, “L2: Empuraan has been a remarkable chapter in my journey as an artist, one I’ll always treasure.”
He also thanked the audience for their ‘love and support’ in ‘every step of the way’.
About L2: Empuraan
Talking about L2: Empuraan with the press, Mohanlal had called the film ‘brilliant’. Talking to Hindustan Times before the release of Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire, Prithviraj had said, “I don’t know if it’s brilliant, but I’m humbled. Unlike the first film, the film is challenging because it requires us to shoot in numerous locations.”
The film is a sequel to the 2019 film Lucifer, which saw Mohanlal as a mysterious man called Stephen Nedumpally aka Khureshi-Ab’raam. When a major political leader dies, his character steps in to right the wrongs. The sequel is touted to reveal more about his character, hints of which were dropped in the first part.
Prithviraj had also directed Mohanlal in Bro Daddy, a comedy film he also starred in. Prithviraj was last seen in Bade Miyan Chote Miyan. He will soon be seen in Salaar: Part 2 – Shouryanga Parvam. Mohanlal will star in Barroz, Thudarum and Kannappa.
Group Media Publications
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
India
Bid to derail Rajdhani Express, another train foiled in UP’s Hardon, say police

An attempt to derail two trains, including a Rajdhani Express, in Uttar Pradesh’s Hardoi district was foiled due to the alertness of loco pilots, according to news agency PTI. The pilot of a Rajdhani Express applied the emergency brake after spotting an obstruction and informed railway officials. A second attempt was made to derail a Kathgodam Express following.
The Rajdhani Express. Unidentified miscreants tied wooden blocks using earthing wire to the track between Dalelnagar and Umartali stations on Monday evening. The Hardoi Police confirmed that teams from the Government Railway Police, Railway Protection Force, and local police are investigating the incidents.
In a similar incident, two persons were arrested for allegedly conspiring to derail a train by placing a steel drum on a railway track near Aunka village Baksha police station. The Railway Protection Force (RPF) helped foil their attempt, and both confessed to their crime. They were sent to jail under sections 151 and 153 of the Railways Act. Further investigation is ongoing.
RPF personnel spotted a steel drum lying on the railway tracks between Sarai Harkhu and Shri Krishna Nagar stations on the Varanasi-Lucknow route via Sultanpur. They acted swiftly to remove the drum and clear the track, while also promptly informing authorities at both railway stations and the Baksha police
Hardoi (Uttar Pradesh), May 20: A major tragedy was averted on Sunday night when an alleged attempt to derail the New Delhi-Dibrugarh Rajdhani Express and another passenger train was foiled near the Umartali railway crossing in Hardoi district, Uttar Pradesh, police said. Timely intervention by alert railway personnel and local police prevented what could have been a catastrophic incident affecting hundreds of passengers.
According to officials, the incident took place around 11:30 PM when patrolling railway staff discovered deliberate tampering on the railway track between Sandila and Umartali stations, a section that falls under the Lucknow division of the Northern Railway zone Some fishplates and fastening clips had been removed from the tracks, which could have caused the train to.
Derail at high speed,” said Superintendent of Police (Hardoi), Keshav Kumar. “Our initial investigation suggests this was a deliberate act of sabotage. A case has been registered and teams have been deployed to identify and apprehend the culprits. The Rajdhani Express, which was scheduled to pass through the affected section shortly after midnight, was halted.
Thoroughly checked before being allowed to proceed. A second train on the same route was also delayed as a precautionary measure Railway Protection Force (RPF) and Government Railway Police (GRP) teams rushed to the site following the report of track tampering. Emergency repairs were conducted, and the track restored operational condition within.
A few hours, minimizing disruption to rail traffic This incident comes amid heightened security alerts across the railway network in northern India, following recent intelligence inputs indicating the possibility of sabotage attempts by anti-social elements We are taking this very seriously,” said a senior Northern Railway official. “The safety of our passengers.
Paramount importance. Regular track inspections and security audits are being intensified in the wake of this incident Local villagers near the railway line activity near the tracks late in the evening. Police have launched a manhunt based on leads from the area. CCTV footage from nearby railway posts and level crossings is being reviewed.
For possible clues Hardoi District Magistrate Mangla Prasad Singh said, “Fortunately, due to the vigilance of railway patrol personnel, we were able to prevent a disaster. An investigation is underway and we are confident of arresting those responsible soon.
- Group Media Publication
- Construction, Infrastructure and Mining
- General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
- Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/
India
Constitution does not protect forced or fraudulent conversion: Allahabad HC

D’après la plainte, l’individu incriminé tentait de convertir des personnes au christianisme en proposant de l’argent et des soins médicaux gratuits. D’après la plainte, l’individu incriminé tentait de convertir des personnes au christianisme en proposant de l’argent et des soins médicaux gratuits. La Haute Cour d’Allahabad a souligné que, bien que la Constitution.
Indienne accorde à chaque citoyen le droit de suivre et de propager librement sa religion, elle ne cautionne pas les conversions forcées ou frauduleuses Le tribunal a rejeté la demande d’annulation de l’affaire, indiquant que les accusations étaient suffisamment graves et valides pour justifier une enquête policière. Vous êtes formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023.
Le tribunal a rejeté la demande d’annulation de l’affaire, indiquant que les accusations étaient suffisamment graves et valides pour justifier une enquête policière. Vous êtes formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 Prayagraj, May 19, 2025 — In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has clarified that while Article 25 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right.
To freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, this right does not extend to forced or fraudulent religious conversions. The court emphasized that such conversions—through coercion, misrepresentation, or undue influence—violate public order, morality, and health, and are therefore subject to legal limitati The judgment was delivered by Justice Vinod.
Diwakar while rejecting a plea to quash a First Information Report (FIR) against four individuals accused under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. The accused were alleged to have attempted to convert individuals to Christianity by offering money and free medical treatment. The court deemed the allegations serious enough.
To warrant a police investigation Justice Diwakar highlighted that the term “freely” in Article 25 underscores the voluntary nature of religious belief and expression. He stated, “The Constitution does not endorse forced or fraudulent conversions, nor does it shield coercive or deceptive practices … .” Such practices, the court noted, are antithetical to the principles.
Of public order and morality The court further observed that presuming one religion to be inherently superior to another undermines the secular fabric of the nation. “Such a notion is fundamentally antithetical the judgment stated Addressing the legal framework, the court upheld the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of … , stating that the law aims preserve.
Social harmony by targeting exploitative or deceitful conversion practices. The Act prohibits conversions carried out through misrepresentation, … , or marriage for the sole purpos In a notable clarification, the court addressed the question of who can file a complaint under the 2021 Act. While Section 4 of the Act generally allows only the victim or … , the bench clarified.
That a Station House Officer (SHO) can also file such FIRs. This interpretation aligns the Act with the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surak which allows the police to act in This ruling reinforces the constitutional commitment to religious freedom while delineating its boundaries to prevent misuse under the guise of propagation. It underscores the state’s.
Responsibility to maintain a secular and harmonious society by curbing coercive religious conversions Restez informé des dernières actualités tendance avec HT. Consultez des articles détaillés The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the Indian Constitution does not protect forced or fraudulent religious conversions. Justice Vinod Diwakar stated that while Article 25.
Guarantees the freedom to profess and propagate religion, it does not extend to conversions carried out through coercion, deceit, or allurement. The court was hearing a case under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. It emphasized that such actions.
- Group Media Publication
- Construction, Infrastructure and Mining
- General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
- Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/
India
Supreme Court agrees to hear plea of Ashoka University professor against arrest

Ali Khan Mahmudabad, professeur à l’Université Ashoka, a été arrêté pour ses commentaires sur les réseaux sociaux concernant l’opération « Sindoor » de l’Inde. La Cour Suprême a donné son accord lundi pour entendre en urgence une requête déposée par le professeur d’Ashoka University, Ali Khan Mahmudabad, qui conteste son arrestation récente suite à des.
Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient.
Misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 L’avocat senior Kapil Sibal, qui représentait Mahmudabad, a évoqué l’affaire devant une formation de la Cour suprême. La Cour suprême examinera les affaires du professeur de l’Université Ashoka dans les deux prochains jours New Delhi, May 19, 2025 — The Supreme Court of India has agreed.
To hear a petition filed by Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, head of the Political Science department at Ashoka University, challenging his recent arrest over social media comments concerning “Operation Sindoor.” The hearing is scheduled for May 20 or 21 Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mahmudabad, presented the matter before a bench led by Chief.
Justice B.R. Gavai, requesting an urgent hearing. Sibal contended that the professor’s statements were “entirely patriotic” and that the arrest infringed upon his constitutional right to free expression Mahmudabad was arrested on May 18 by Haryana Police from his residence in Delhi and is currently detained at the Rai police station in Sonipat. Two First Information.
Reports (FIRs) have been filed against him: one by Renu Bhatia, Chairperson of the Haryana State Commission for Women, and another by Yogesh Jatheri, a local BJP Yuva Morcha leader. The charges include promoting enmity between groups, making assertions prejudicial to national integration, and endangering India’s sovereignty The controversy centers on.
Mahmudabad’s social media post analyzing the government’s military action, “Operation Sindoor,” against terror groups in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. In his post, he referred to the initial media briefings conducted by women officers as “optics” and questioned whether symbolic gestures translate into substantive change Mahmudabad further expressed.
Concern over the lack of protection for victims of mob lynchings and arbitrary actions, suggesting that true patriotism involves safeguarding all citizens’ rights The Haryana State Commission for Women criticized the comments as disparaging toward women officers and promoting communal discord. However, Mahmudabad’s colleagues and academic defended his.
Remarks, asserting that his analysis supported India’s strategic response to terrorism and highlighted the symbolic inclusion of women officers as a reflection of secular values The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) condemned the arrest as “wholly unwarranted,” emphasizing concerns over increasing restrictions on academics intellectuals.
In the country. They called for Mahmudabad’s immediate release, defending his academic freedom and right to express his views Ashoka University has stated that it is cooperating with the investigation while verifying the situation. The case has sparked a broader debate on freedom of expression and the treatment of academics in India The Supreme Court’s Forthcoming hearing will address the legality of Mahmudabad’s arrest and its implications for civil
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a plea filed by an Ashoka University professor challenging his arrest. The professor, who faces charges related to alleged inflammatory remarks and writings, sought protection from coercive action and quashing of the FIR. The plea argues that the arrest violates his fundamental rights, including freedom of speech.
- Group Media Publication
- Construction, Infrastructure and Mining
- General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
- Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/
-
Tech4 months ago
Best Zebronics Bluetooth speakers you can buy today for an unmatched audio experience
-
India2 years ago
New Season 8 The Walking Dead trailer flashes forward in time
-
India2 years ago
The afternoon briefing revealed that 97.26% of the ₹2000 notes were returned, and the Israeli Prime Minister committed to war goals.
-
World12 months ago
Michigan splash pad attack: A couple was shot seven times in total while defending their two small daughters.
-
India2 years ago
Srikanth Venkatachari is appointed as the new chief financial officer by Reliance Industries.
-
India2 years ago
PM Modi’s Three-Nation Tour Begins with a Traditional Welcome in Papua New Guinea
-
India8 years ago
The 9 worst mistakes you can ever make at work
-
Special 365 days2 years ago
Flag Day of India