The Indian Supreme Court (SC) is hearing petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which was enacted into law last month. Chief Justice BR Gavai stated that laws passed by Parliament are assumed to be constitutional, and courts cannot intervene unless there is a clear and serious problem. The apex court identified three key issues: Waqf by user.

The nomination of non-Muslims to the Waqf Council and state Waqf Boards, and the identification of government land as Waqf property. The Centre had assured it would not proceed on these matters until the case was settled. However, senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, opposed this. Sibal argued that the Act.

Is designed to seize Waqf lands without due process, and that only a person who has practised Islam for at least five years can create a Waqf. Chief Justice Gavai responded that there is a presumption of Constitutionality in legislation passed by Parliament and that courts cannot interfere unless a glaring case is made out New Delhi, May 20: Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y.

Chandrachud, along with Justice B.R. Gavial, made a significant observation during a Supreme Court hearing regarding the constitutional validity of the Waqf Act, 1995. In a statement that could have far-reaching implications, Justice Gavial remarked that “courts cannot interfere unless a glaring case is made out. The remark came during the hearing of a petition that.

Challenged certain provisions of the Waqf Act, citing alleged violation of constitutional principles such as equality before law, secularism, and property rights. The petitioner argued that the Act conferred excessive powers on the Waqf Boards and allowed encroachment on private property under the pretext of religious administration Justice Gavai, while responding.

To the petitioner’s counsel, emphasized the constitutional limits within which the judiciary operates. “Every religious or charitable trust—be it Hindu, Christian, or Muslim—has its own framework under the law. Unless a glaring violation of constitutional rights is demonstrated, judicial interference would be unwarranted,” he stated The bench questioned whether.

The petitioner had established sufficient grounds to show that the Act was inherently discriminatory or arbitrary. “We are not here to sit in judgment over Parliament’s legislative competence unless it is shown that the law is manifestly unconstitutional,” CJI Chandrachud added The Waqf Act, 1995, governs the administration of waqf properties—assets donated for.

Religious or charitable purposes under Islamic law. The Act provides for the creation of State Waqf Boards to manage such properties and address related disputes. Over the years, it has been the subject of several legal controversies, particularly concerning land ownership and the scope of powers exercised by the Waqf Boards The petitioner contended that the Act enables.

Waqf Boards to unilaterally declare properties as waqf without due legal process, thereby infringing on the property rights of individuals. The counsel also cited instances where people discovered that their land was classified as waqf only during transactions or legal disputes Justice Gavai acknowledged that concerns regarding land ownership and procedural fairness.

Important but reiterated the need for clear constitutional breaches before striking down any law. “You may have individual grievances, but that does not automatically render the entire Act unconstitutional,” he said The court advised the petitioner to pursue remedies through civil courts in cases of disputed property classification. CJI Chandrachud remarked someone.

Land has been wrongly notified as waqf, they have the right to challenge it. But that is a matter of individual litigation, not a ground to annul the statute itself Legal.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

Ali Khan Mahmudabad, professeur à l’Université Ashoka, a été arrêté pour ses commentaires sur les réseaux sociaux concernant l’opération « Sindoor » de l’Inde. La Cour Suprême a donné son accord lundi pour entendre en urgence une requête déposée par le professeur d’Ashoka University, Ali Khan Mahmudabad, qui conteste son arrestation récente suite à des.

Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient.

Misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 L’avocat senior Kapil Sibal, qui représentait Mahmudabad, a évoqué l’affaire devant une formation de la Cour suprême. La Cour suprême examinera les affaires du professeur de l’Université Ashoka dans les deux prochains jours New Delhi, May 19, 2025 — The Supreme Court of India has agreed.

To hear a petition filed by Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, head of the Political Science department at Ashoka University, challenging his recent arrest over social media comments concerning “Operation Sindoor.” The hearing is scheduled for May 20 or 21 Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mahmudabad, presented the matter before a bench led by Chief.

Justice B.R. Gavai, requesting an urgent hearing. Sibal contended that the professor’s statements were “entirely patriotic” and that the arrest infringed upon his constitutional right to free expression Mahmudabad was arrested on May 18 by Haryana Police from his residence in Delhi and is currently detained at the Rai police station in Sonipat. Two First Information.

Reports (FIRs) have been filed against him: one by Renu Bhatia, Chairperson of the Haryana State Commission for Women, and another by Yogesh Jatheri, a local BJP Yuva Morcha leader. The charges include promoting enmity between groups, making assertions prejudicial to national integration, and endangering India’s sovereignty The controversy centers on.

Mahmudabad’s social media post analyzing the government’s military action, “Operation Sindoor,” against terror groups in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. In his post, he referred to the initial media briefings conducted by women officers as “optics” and questioned whether symbolic gestures translate into substantive change Mahmudabad further expressed.

Concern over the lack of protection for victims of mob lynchings and arbitrary actions, suggesting that true patriotism involves safeguarding all citizens’ rights The Haryana State Commission for Women criticized the comments as disparaging toward women officers and promoting communal discord. However, Mahmudabad’s colleagues and academic defended his.

Remarks, asserting that his analysis supported India’s strategic response to terrorism and highlighted the symbolic inclusion of women officers as a reflection of secular values The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) condemned the arrest as “wholly unwarranted,” emphasizing concerns over increasing restrictions on academics intellectuals.

In the country. They called for Mahmudabad’s immediate release, defending his academic freedom and right to express his views Ashoka University has stated that it is cooperating with the investigation while verifying the situation. The case has sparked a broader debate on freedom of expression and the treatment of academics in India The Supreme Court’s Forthcoming hearing will address the legality of Mahmudabad’s arrest and its implications for civil

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a plea filed by an Ashoka University professor challenging his arrest. The professor, who faces charges related to alleged inflammatory remarks and writings, sought protection from coercive action and quashing of the FIR. The plea argues that the arrest violates his fundamental rights, including freedom of speech.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/