The Joint Admission Committee (JAC) Delhi has announced the first round of seat allotment for the 2025 academic session. Students who have been allotted seats in this round are required to report to their respective colleges and complete all admission formalities between June 9 and June 18, 2025. This is an important step to confirm their admission and secure their seat.

To check the seat allotment result, candidates can visit the official JAC Delhi website at jacdelhi.admissions.nic.in. They will need their JEE Main application number and password to log in and view their seat allocation status. This online process makes it convenient for applicants to quickly know where they stand in the admission process.

The seat allotment covers some of Delhi’s top engineering and architecture institutes, including Delhi Technological University (DTU), Netaji Subhas University of Technology (NSUT), Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women (IGDTUW), and Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IIIT-Delhi). For this year, there are a total of 7,333 seats available for BTech courses and 90 seats for BArch courses under JAC Delhi.

It’s important for students who have been allotted seats to complete their admission process within the given timeframe to avoid losing their seat. Those who don’t get a seat in the first round or want to upgrade their choice can participate in further rounds of seat allotment, which will be announced soon. Keeping track of official notifications on the JAC Delhi website is essential for timely updates.

Reporting & Admission Dates

Candidates who have secured a seat in Round 1 must report to their allotted institute between June 9 and June 18, 2025. Admission formalities like document verification and fee payment must be completed during this period.

Top Institutions in JAC Delhi

• Delhi Technological University (DTU) – Highly sought-after for CSE, ECE, and Mechanical branches.
• Netaji Subhas University of Technology (NSUT) – Strong in AI, IT, and automation fields.
• IGDTUW – Focused on empowering women through technical education.
• IIIT-Delhi – Renowned for Computer Science, Data Science, and interdisciplinary tech programs.

Seat Allotment Trends

• CSE and AI remain the most competitive streams.
• Students with higher JEE Main ranks were able to grab top choices.
• EWS and OBC quotas saw a sharp increase in cut-offs compared to previous years.

📎 What to Do Next

Candidates who didn’t get a seat or wish to upgrade can participate in the next rounds. Ensure that all required documents (10th/12th marksheets, JEE scorecard, category certificates) are ready.

The much-anticipated Round 1 seat allotment for JAC Delhi 2025 has officially been released, marking the beginning of the admission journey for thousands of engineering and architecture aspirants across India. For many students, this announcement is the culmination of months of preparation, dedication, and high-stakes competition through the JEE Main exam.

The seat allocation process provides clarity on which college and course they have secured, paving the way for the next important steps—reporting to the allotted institution, verifying documents, and paying the required fees within the given window from June 9 to June 18.

This first round is a crucial milestone, especially for those aiming to grab seats in highly competitive branches like Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Data Science. Students who may not have received their preferred course or college still have the option to participate in subsequent rounds, which allows for better positioning based on availability and merit.

The JAC Delhi counselling process is unique because it brings together some of the most reputed engineering institutions in the capital under one umbrella. Unlike other centralized admission systems in India, JAC Delhi caters exclusively to students applying through the JEE Main scores and seeks to ensure a transparent, merit-based seat distribution. With limited seats and sky-high demand, even a slight change in rank or category can significantly affect a student’s chances of getting into their desired stream or college. This makes each round—especially the first—extremely strategic for aspirants.

This year, the response to the first round of seat allotment was intense, with a large number of students quickly logging in to check their allocation status on the official JAC Delhi portal. Due to the high traffic, the site experienced occasional slowdowns, but most students were able to access their results by mid-day. For many, the moment was filled with either celebration or planning their next move—be it accepting the allotted seat or preparing for the upgrade round.

Colleges like DTU and NSUT have continued their tradition of attracting top JEE Main rankers, especially in branches like Computer Science, Electronics & Communication, and Artificial Intelligence. The cut-off for CSE at DTU has again seen a sharp upward trend, reflecting the consistent popularity and industry-aligned curriculum the college offers. On the other hand, IIIT-Delhi continues to appeal to students who are focused on research, data science, and niche tech domains, even though it follows a different fee and admission model.

One of the most appreciated aspects of the JAC Delhi process is its inclusion of the Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women (IGDTUW), which focuses on empowering female students in the STEM domain. The university has seen a rise in applicants this year, particularly in BTech streams related to IT, AI, and cybersecurity. The specialized infrastructure, women-centric ecosystem, and growing placement record make IGDTUW a strong contender among the JAC Delhi institutions.

As students begin the admission formalities for Round 1, there’s a strong emphasis on ensuring that all submitted documents are accurate and updated. Any mismatch in the personal information, category certificates, or academic records can lead to the cancellation of the allotted seat. Counsellors advise students to double-check their documentation and prepare for physical reporting at the respective college without delay. Since the reporting window is narrow—only from June 9 to June 18—timely action is critical.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

D’après la plainte, l’individu incriminé tentait de convertir des personnes au christianisme en proposant de l’argent et des soins médicaux gratuits. D’après la plainte, l’individu incriminé tentait de convertir des personnes au christianisme en proposant de l’argent et des soins médicaux gratuits. La Haute Cour d’Allahabad a souligné que, bien que la Constitution.

Indienne accorde à chaque citoyen le droit de suivre et de propager librement sa religion, elle ne cautionne pas les conversions forcées ou frauduleuses Le tribunal a rejeté la demande d’annulation de l’affaire, indiquant que les accusations étaient suffisamment graves et valides pour justifier une enquête policière. Vous êtes formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023.

Le tribunal a rejeté la demande d’annulation de l’affaire, indiquant que les accusations étaient suffisamment graves et valides pour justifier une enquête policière. Vous êtes formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 Prayagraj, May 19, 2025 — In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has clarified that while Article 25 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right.

To freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, this right does not extend to forced or fraudulent religious conversions. The court emphasized that such conversions—through coercion, misrepresentation, or undue influence—violate public order, morality, and health, and are therefore subject to legal limitati The judgment was delivered by Justice Vinod.

Diwakar while rejecting a plea to quash a First Information Report (FIR) against four individuals accused under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. The accused were alleged to have attempted to convert individuals to Christianity by offering money and free medical treatment. The court deemed the allegations serious enough.

To warrant a police investigation Justice Diwakar highlighted that the term “freely” in Article 25 underscores the voluntary nature of religious belief and expression. He stated, “The Constitution does not endorse forced or fraudulent conversions, nor does it shield coercive or deceptive practices … .” Such practices, the court noted, are antithetical to the principles.

Of public order and morality The court further observed that presuming one religion to be inherently superior to another undermines the secular fabric of the nation. “Such a notion is fundamentally antithetical the judgment stated Addressing the legal framework, the court upheld the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of … , stating that the law aims preserve.

Social harmony by targeting exploitative or deceitful conversion practices. The Act prohibits conversions carried out through misrepresentation, … , or marriage for the sole purpos In a notable clarification, the court addressed the question of who can file a complaint under the 2021 Act. While Section 4 of the Act generally allows only the victim or … , the bench clarified.

That a Station House Officer (SHO) can also file such FIRs. This interpretation aligns the Act with the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surak which allows the police to act in This ruling reinforces the constitutional commitment to religious freedom while delineating its boundaries to prevent misuse under the guise of propagation. It underscores the state’s.

Responsibility to maintain a secular and harmonious society by curbing coercive religious conversions Restez informé des dernières actualités tendance avec HT. Consultez des articles détaillés The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the Indian Constitution does not protect forced or fraudulent religious conversions. Justice Vinod Diwakar stated that while Article 25.

Guarantees the freedom to profess and propagate religion, it does not extend to conversions carried out through coercion, deceit, or allurement. The court was hearing a case under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. It emphasized that such actions.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

Ali Khan Mahmudabad, professeur à l’Université Ashoka, a été arrêté pour ses commentaires sur les réseaux sociaux concernant l’opération « Sindoor » de l’Inde. La Cour Suprême a donné son accord lundi pour entendre en urgence une requête déposée par le professeur d’Ashoka University, Ali Khan Mahmudabad, qui conteste son arrestation récente suite à des.

Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient.

Misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 L’avocat senior Kapil Sibal, qui représentait Mahmudabad, a évoqué l’affaire devant une formation de la Cour suprême. La Cour suprême examinera les affaires du professeur de l’Université Ashoka dans les deux prochains jours New Delhi, May 19, 2025 — The Supreme Court of India has agreed.

To hear a petition filed by Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, head of the Political Science department at Ashoka University, challenging his recent arrest over social media comments concerning “Operation Sindoor.” The hearing is scheduled for May 20 or 21 Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mahmudabad, presented the matter before a bench led by Chief.

Justice B.R. Gavai, requesting an urgent hearing. Sibal contended that the professor’s statements were “entirely patriotic” and that the arrest infringed upon his constitutional right to free expression Mahmudabad was arrested on May 18 by Haryana Police from his residence in Delhi and is currently detained at the Rai police station in Sonipat. Two First Information.

Reports (FIRs) have been filed against him: one by Renu Bhatia, Chairperson of the Haryana State Commission for Women, and another by Yogesh Jatheri, a local BJP Yuva Morcha leader. The charges include promoting enmity between groups, making assertions prejudicial to national integration, and endangering India’s sovereignty The controversy centers on.

Mahmudabad’s social media post analyzing the government’s military action, “Operation Sindoor,” against terror groups in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. In his post, he referred to the initial media briefings conducted by women officers as “optics” and questioned whether symbolic gestures translate into substantive change Mahmudabad further expressed.

Concern over the lack of protection for victims of mob lynchings and arbitrary actions, suggesting that true patriotism involves safeguarding all citizens’ rights The Haryana State Commission for Women criticized the comments as disparaging toward women officers and promoting communal discord. However, Mahmudabad’s colleagues and academic defended his.

Remarks, asserting that his analysis supported India’s strategic response to terrorism and highlighted the symbolic inclusion of women officers as a reflection of secular values The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) condemned the arrest as “wholly unwarranted,” emphasizing concerns over increasing restrictions on academics intellectuals.

In the country. They called for Mahmudabad’s immediate release, defending his academic freedom and right to express his views Ashoka University has stated that it is cooperating with the investigation while verifying the situation. The case has sparked a broader debate on freedom of expression and the treatment of academics in India The Supreme Court’s Forthcoming hearing will address the legality of Mahmudabad’s arrest and its implications for civil

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a plea filed by an Ashoka University professor challenging his arrest. The professor, who faces charges related to alleged inflammatory remarks and writings, sought protection from coercive action and quashing of the FIR. The plea argues that the arrest violates his fundamental rights, including freedom of speech.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/