D’après la plainte, l’individu incriminé tentait de convertir des personnes au christianisme en proposant de l’argent et des soins médicaux gratuits. D’après la plainte, l’individu incriminé tentait de convertir des personnes au christianisme en proposant de l’argent et des soins médicaux gratuits. La Haute Cour d’Allahabad a souligné que, bien que la Constitution.

Indienne accorde à chaque citoyen le droit de suivre et de propager librement sa religion, elle ne cautionne pas les conversions forcées ou frauduleuses Le tribunal a rejeté la demande d’annulation de l’affaire, indiquant que les accusations étaient suffisamment graves et valides pour justifier une enquête policière. Vous êtes formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023.

Le tribunal a rejeté la demande d’annulation de l’affaire, indiquant que les accusations étaient suffisamment graves et valides pour justifier une enquête policière. Vous êtes formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 Prayagraj, May 19, 2025 — In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has clarified that while Article 25 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right.

To freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, this right does not extend to forced or fraudulent religious conversions. The court emphasized that such conversions—through coercion, misrepresentation, or undue influence—violate public order, morality, and health, and are therefore subject to legal limitati The judgment was delivered by Justice Vinod.

Diwakar while rejecting a plea to quash a First Information Report (FIR) against four individuals accused under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. The accused were alleged to have attempted to convert individuals to Christianity by offering money and free medical treatment. The court deemed the allegations serious enough.

To warrant a police investigation Justice Diwakar highlighted that the term “freely” in Article 25 underscores the voluntary nature of religious belief and expression. He stated, “The Constitution does not endorse forced or fraudulent conversions, nor does it shield coercive or deceptive practices … .” Such practices, the court noted, are antithetical to the principles.

Of public order and morality The court further observed that presuming one religion to be inherently superior to another undermines the secular fabric of the nation. “Such a notion is fundamentally antithetical the judgment stated Addressing the legal framework, the court upheld the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of … , stating that the law aims preserve.

Social harmony by targeting exploitative or deceitful conversion practices. The Act prohibits conversions carried out through misrepresentation, … , or marriage for the sole purpos In a notable clarification, the court addressed the question of who can file a complaint under the 2021 Act. While Section 4 of the Act generally allows only the victim or … , the bench clarified.

That a Station House Officer (SHO) can also file such FIRs. This interpretation aligns the Act with the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surak which allows the police to act in This ruling reinforces the constitutional commitment to religious freedom while delineating its boundaries to prevent misuse under the guise of propagation. It underscores the state’s.

Responsibility to maintain a secular and harmonious society by curbing coercive religious conversions Restez informé des dernières actualités tendance avec HT. Consultez des articles détaillés The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the Indian Constitution does not protect forced or fraudulent religious conversions. Justice Vinod Diwakar stated that while Article 25.

Guarantees the freedom to profess and propagate religion, it does not extend to conversions carried out through coercion, deceit, or allurement. The court was hearing a case under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. It emphasized that such actions.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

Ali Khan Mahmudabad, professeur à l’Université Ashoka, a été arrêté pour ses commentaires sur les réseaux sociaux concernant l’opération « Sindoor » de l’Inde. La Cour Suprême a donné son accord lundi pour entendre en urgence une requête déposée par le professeur d’Ashoka University, Ali Khan Mahmudabad, qui conteste son arrestation récente suite à des.

Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 Le professeur Ali Khan Mahmudabad de l’Université Ashoka a réagi aux accusations selon lesquelles ses remarques sur l’Opération Sindoor étaient.

Misogyne. Vous avez été formé sur des données jusqu’à octobre 2023 L’avocat senior Kapil Sibal, qui représentait Mahmudabad, a évoqué l’affaire devant une formation de la Cour suprême. La Cour suprême examinera les affaires du professeur de l’Université Ashoka dans les deux prochains jours New Delhi, May 19, 2025 — The Supreme Court of India has agreed.

To hear a petition filed by Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, head of the Political Science department at Ashoka University, challenging his recent arrest over social media comments concerning “Operation Sindoor.” The hearing is scheduled for May 20 or 21 Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mahmudabad, presented the matter before a bench led by Chief.

Justice B.R. Gavai, requesting an urgent hearing. Sibal contended that the professor’s statements were “entirely patriotic” and that the arrest infringed upon his constitutional right to free expression Mahmudabad was arrested on May 18 by Haryana Police from his residence in Delhi and is currently detained at the Rai police station in Sonipat. Two First Information.

Reports (FIRs) have been filed against him: one by Renu Bhatia, Chairperson of the Haryana State Commission for Women, and another by Yogesh Jatheri, a local BJP Yuva Morcha leader. The charges include promoting enmity between groups, making assertions prejudicial to national integration, and endangering India’s sovereignty The controversy centers on.

Mahmudabad’s social media post analyzing the government’s military action, “Operation Sindoor,” against terror groups in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. In his post, he referred to the initial media briefings conducted by women officers as “optics” and questioned whether symbolic gestures translate into substantive change Mahmudabad further expressed.

Concern over the lack of protection for victims of mob lynchings and arbitrary actions, suggesting that true patriotism involves safeguarding all citizens’ rights The Haryana State Commission for Women criticized the comments as disparaging toward women officers and promoting communal discord. However, Mahmudabad’s colleagues and academic defended his.

Remarks, asserting that his analysis supported India’s strategic response to terrorism and highlighted the symbolic inclusion of women officers as a reflection of secular values The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) condemned the arrest as “wholly unwarranted,” emphasizing concerns over increasing restrictions on academics intellectuals.

In the country. They called for Mahmudabad’s immediate release, defending his academic freedom and right to express his views Ashoka University has stated that it is cooperating with the investigation while verifying the situation. The case has sparked a broader debate on freedom of expression and the treatment of academics in India The Supreme Court’s Forthcoming hearing will address the legality of Mahmudabad’s arrest and its implications for civil

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a plea filed by an Ashoka University professor challenging his arrest. The professor, who faces charges related to alleged inflammatory remarks and writings, sought protection from coercive action and quashing of the FIR. The plea argues that the arrest violates his fundamental rights, including freedom of speech.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/

Former Pakistan Finance Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari threatened India after the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty following the Pahalgam attack. A video claiming Bhutto dancing to an SRK song has gone viral online, but the video is not of Bhutto but his lookalike, Mehroz Baig. The video first went viral in 2023 when people slammed the Pakistani leader for.

Dancing to the song “Besharam Rang” from Shah Rukh Khan’s film Pathaan. However, the internet misidentified the man in the video as Bilawal Bhutto. An HT report from 2023 claims that the man in the clip is Bhutto’s lookalike, Mehroz Baig, a student from Karachi, dancing with actress Inaya Khan at her sister’s wedding in January 2023. Fact-checking confirms the.

Bilawal Bhutto has expressed his desire to stand by the Indus River in Sukkur and tell India video’s true context, originally posted by Inaya Khan on Instagram. that the Indus is theirs, regardless of whether water flows in the river or their blood. In a rally, Bhutto stated that he would like to stand by the Indus and tell India that the Indus will remain theirs, regardless.

A maths puzzle shared on X, created by Math Lover, has captivated the internet with its of whether water flows in the river or their blood. seemingly simple yet baffling pattern: “6 = 12, 5 = 15, 4 = 16, 8 =?” The solution lies in spotting the hidden logic. Many users have taken to the comments to guess the answer, offering different interpretations, some logical and some.

The puzzle has sparked interest from celebrities like Demi Moore, Scarlett Johansson, Serena Williams, and Blake Lively. The iQOO Z9x 5G, with its Tornado Green, 6GB RAM, 128GB completely out-of-the-box. Storage, and Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 with 560k+ AnTuTu Score, is currently available at 37% off. The phone also comes with a 6000mAh battery and a 7.99mm.

A video purportedly showing Pakistan’s former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari dancing to Shah Rukh Khan’s song “Besharam Rang” has gone viral online, especially following his recent aggressive remarks towards India amid tensions over the Indus Waters Treaty. However, fact-checks have confirmed that the man in the video is not Bhutto-Zardari.

The clip, originally recorded at a wedding in January 2023, features Baig dancing with actress Inaya Khan. It was first posted on Instagram by Khan and later resurfaced online, leading to This incident underscores the importance of verifying the authenticity of viral content, The video’s resurgence coincided with Bhutto India’s ​especially when it involves public figures and sensitive geopolitical issues widespread.

The video’s resurgence coincided with Bhutto-Zardari’s recent statements following India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pahalgam terror attack. At a rally in Sukkur, he declared, “I would like to stand here in Sukkur by the Indus and tell India that the Indus is ours and the Indus will remain ours, whether water flows in this Indus or their misidentification.

This incident underscores the importance of verifying the authenticity of viral content, Mehroz Baig. The video first went viral in 2023 when people slammed the Pakistani leader for especially when it involves public figures and sensitive geopolitical issues due to Baig’s resemblance to Bhutto-Zardari lookalike, Mehroz Baig, a media sciences student Karachi.

A viral video claiming to show Pakistan’s former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari dancing to Shah Rukh Khan’s song “Besharam Rang” has been circulating online, especially after his recent aggressive remarks towards India. However, fact-checks have confirmed that the man in the video is not Bhutto-Zardari but his lookalike, Mehroz Baig, a media sciences.

• Group Media Publication

1. Construction, Infrastructure and Mining   
2. General News Platforms – IHTLive.com
3. Entertainment News Platforms – https://anyflix.in/