Connect with us

India

Arvind Kejriwal as 2 defendants obtain bail in case of Delhi liquor scandal being fraudulent, even the court says so

Published

on

The recent decision of a Delhi court to grant bail to Arvind Kejriwal and two other defendants in a case related to the alleged fraudulent issuance of licenses for the sale of liquor in the city has sparked controversy and criticism.

The case, which dates back to 2017, involves allegations of corruption and irregularities in the issuance of licenses for the sale of liquor in Delhi. The defendants, including Kejriwal, who is the Chief Minister of Delhi and the leader of the Aam Aadmi Party, were accused of being involved in the scam.

However, the court, while granting bail, has stated that there is no evidence to suggest that Kejriwal or the other defendants were involved in the fraud. The court also noted that the prosecution has failed to produce any concrete evidence to support its claims.

The decision to grant bail to the defendants has been met with mixed reactions, with some people praising the court’s decision and others criticizing it. Some people believe that the court’s decision is a victory for justice and that the defendants have been wrongly accused, while others feel that the decision is a setback for the fight against corruption in India.

The case has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the issuance of licenses and permits in India. Corruption and irregularities in the issuance of licenses and permits are rampant in many parts of the country, and cases like this only serve to undermine public trust in the system.

Advertisement

In conclusion, the decision of the Delhi court to grant bail to Arvind Kejriwal and the other defendants in the liquor license scam case has sparked controversy and criticism. While the court has noted that there is no evidence to suggest that the defendants were involved in the fraud, the case highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the issuance of licenses and permits in India. It is important that the government takes steps to address corruption and irregularities in the system and restore public trust in the system.

General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in 
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

Continue Reading
Advertisement

India

“No one is certain,” says Revanth Reddy, the most recent Congressman to question the Balakot airstrikes.

Published

on

Revanth Reddy, the chief minister of Telangana, became the latest leader of the Congress party and the opposition to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the Indian Air Force’s (IAF) operation on Pakistani territory in February 2019 when he questioned the validity of the Balakot airstrikes on Friday.

“It’s unclear whether the airstrike actually occurred as reported. At a news conference, Reddy stated, “If it was our (Congress’) responsibility to ensure the nation’s internal security, we wouldn’t have left it in anyone’s hands.”

The head of the Congress party charged that Prime Minister Modi and the BJP were attempting to get “political benefits” from the attack on Pulwama and the IAF’s retaliation strikes.

“May I inquire what you were doing, PM? Why did you allow the attack on Pulwama to occur? What steps did you take to strengthen internal security in the nation? Why didn’t you enlist the aid of organisations like the IB and R&AW that were at your disposal? You were the one who failed,” he yelled.

The chief minister of Telangana then urged voters to unseat the Modi administration in the current Lok Sabha elections.

Advertisement

“Winning elections is the only thing that matters to Modi. His kind of thinking is detrimental to the nation. The nation needs to rid itself of Modi and the BJP at this point. They were unable to stop the incident in Pulwama. What was going on at the Intelligence Bureau? Reddy enquired.

On February 14, 2019, a Jaish-e-Mohammed suicide bomber crashed an IED-laden car into a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) bus, resulting in the Pulwama incident. IAF fighter planes destroyed a Jaish stronghold in Balakot, Pakistan, on February 26, killing a significant number of terrorists and damaging their infrastructure.

General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in 
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

Continue Reading

India

Judge Arvind Kejriwal grants him provisional bail and orders him to appear in court on June 2.

Published

on

In the Delhi excise policy case, the Supreme Court on Friday granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal until June 1 in light of the ongoing general elections. The court rejected the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) arguments that political leaders should not receive any “special treatment” in connection with their campaigning.

A panel of justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta said, “We are passing an order giving him interim bail till June 1,” hinting that a more thorough ruling will be made later in the day.

In the case, ED’s solicitor general Tushar Mehta and assistant solicitor general SV Raju protested to the temporary bail, arguing that everyone should get “equitable treatment.” However, the bench dismissed the protests. Law enforcement officials pleaded with the judge to place restrictions on Kejriwal, promising him not to discuss the excise policy matter while he was out on bond.

At this time, Kejriwal’s attorney, senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, asked the bench to extend the temporary bail period till June 4, the day the Lok Sabha election results are announced. The plea was rejected by the bench.

Mehta stepped in and asked that the court order specify that he will turn himself in to the Tihar jail officials on June 2 and that the bail period would not be extended.

Advertisement

Justice Khanna nodded and added, “He will surrender on June 2.” The bench then stood, signalling that when the court reconvenes after the summer holiday, in July, Kejriwal’s appeal contesting his detention by the ED on March 21 and the ensuing remand will be considered in full.

These events occur in the midst of the upcoming general election, when polls are expected to be held on June 1 in Punjab and May 25 in Delhi.

Affidavits against “special treatment” for political individuals because of the election were submitted on Thursday by ED. It said that granting bail for the purpose of conducting a poll would create a risky precedent that would erode equality before the law and the rule of law.

According to the agency, granting bail to politicians for the sake of campaigning would provide a loophole that would prevent any politician in a nation like India, where elections are an annual event, from ever being arrested or imprisoned.

In earlier sessions, the court hinted at the possibility of Kejriwal receiving temporary release in light of the election, but it voiced concerns about letting him carry out his chief ministerial responsibilities during that time, citing potential conflicts.

Advertisement

The issue concerns claims of anomalies in the excise policy, which the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) started looking into in July 2022 on the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi’s advice.

The third leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) to be taken into jail in this matter is Arvind Kejriwal, who is now in judicial custody. Manish Sisodia, his former constable, has been incarcerated since February 2023. Sanjay Singh, an AAP Rajya Sabha member, was detained for six months before being granted release in April.

ED had argued that treating politicians differently from regular residents was a reason not to grant Kejriwal bail. Kejriwal’s dual role as the chief minister and the AAP convener during the elections was recognised by the court, which described it as a “extraordinary situation” deserving of consideration for interim relief.

Concerns were voiced by the court on the possible consequences of granting Kejriwal temporary release and enabling him to sign official documents. “We would prefer that you not carry out your official responsibilities. Conflict would result from it. It is your decision to continue serving as the chief minister, as you have done. That is not the problem we are addressing. However, however, appropriateness rather than legality is the concern. We oppose any meddling in the government’s operations. There would be a ripple effect, Singhvi was informed by the bench.

At first, Singhvi opposed to the suggested requirement, citing the political and democratic rights of his client. Later, he consented that if the Lieutenant Governor would not delay any government proposal by pointing to the lack of the chief minister’s signature, Kejriwal would not sign files during the bail time.

Advertisement

General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in 
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

Continue Reading

India

Congress leader: “Kangana Ranaut once said she likes beef.” BJP retaliates

Published

on

A significant controversy ensued following Congress leader Supriya Shrinate’s controversial social media post about actor-turned-politician Kangana Ranaut.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has criticized Maharashtra Opposition and Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar for claiming actor Kangana Ranaut’s post on Twitter about her beef preferences and the BJP’s decision to grant her a Lok Sabha election ticket.

Shaina NC, a BJP leader in Maharashtra, criticised Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar’s comments and other ludicrous remarks made by Congress leaders. She stated that Wadettiwar’s actions, including granting Kangana Ranaut a ticket due to her beef consumption, are not the first time Congress has made such ludicrous remarks.

Shaina criticizes Congress social media in-charge Supriya Shrinate’s post against Ranaut, claiming that Shrinate’s comments and Randeep Surjewala’s discussion about Hema Malini’s attributes are anti-women, despite her age.

Shaina pledged that all women would participate in the voting process, and the results on June 4 would provide a “fitting answer to Congress.”

Advertisement

The Prime Minister of India has ensured respect for women in various political parties, including Triple Talaq and Nari Shakti Vandan. If the Congress party lacks thought processes, the answer will be on June 4 when Indian women vote against the anti-woman Congress party.

Supriya Shrinate’s post that sparked controversy

Congress leader Supriya Shrinate’s controversial social media post about actor-turned-politician Kangana Ranaut, who received a BJP ticket from the Mandi constituency in Himachal Pradesh for the upcoming Lok Sabha election, sparked a massive controversy.

Kangana, in response to Shrinate’s post, emphasized that every woman deserves respect and dignity. She shared her 20-year career as an artist, which includes portraying various women, from naive girls in Queen to seductive spy in Dhaakad, goddesses in Manikarnika, demons in Chandramukhi, prostitutes in Rajjo, and revolutionary leaders in Thalaivii.

The Congress leader later revealed that someone with access to her social media accounts had posted objectionable content.

Advertisement

General News Platform – https://ihtlive.com/
Entertainment News Platforms – anyflix.in 
Construction Infrastructure and Mining News Platform – https://cimreviews.com/
Podcast Platforms – https://anyfm.in/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 India Hot Topics. Powered with Passion.